Evolution of Technology

Vascular Closure Device

The benefits of needle sticks versus large incisions include shorter operations, shorter hospital stays, less pain, and fewer bleeding risks. Unfortunately, it does not avoid all complications. The vascular access-site, where the needle punctures the artery, is the main focus of these complications which can include things like bleeding, arterial wall ballooning (pseudoaneurysm), and separation of the layers of the arterial wall (dissection). 

Historically, manual compression over the needle stick site has been the gold standard. It requires reversing or stopping anticoagulation, a prolonged bed rest, prolonged time to discharge, and can be uncomfortable for patients. Therefore, vascular closure devices have been developed as specific technology to improve on these limitations. These were introduced in the 1990’s and have several categories based on how they work. Examples are injecting pro-clotting agents, plugs, suture devices, or even clips.

Evolution of Procedure

Percutaneous Arterial Access

Management of PVD was once limited exclusively to open procedures that included large incisions, coring plaques out of arteries (endarterectomy), and bypasses of blocked areas. Around 1960, Sven Seldinger introduced his technique to access vessels with a hollow needle and wire, and from this, multiple minimally invasive innovations blossomed.

These techniques have created a window of opportunity for earlier identification of disease severity and potential interventions such as stents, grafts, and balloon dilations (angioplasty) of plaques. These are termed percutaneous procedures. These minimally invasive percutaneous procedures are often outpatient and offer less morbidity than larger, more invasive procedures.